Slow performance compared to C++, ideas?
Simen Kjaeraas
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Mon Jun 3 22:05:28 PDT 2013
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 06:16:45 +0200, Steven Schveighoffer
<schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think it is unfair to say most classes are not base classes. This
> would mean most classes are marked as final. I don't think they are.
> One of the main reasons to use classes in the first place is for
> extendability.
This is false. Consider this hierarchy: A->B->C, where x->y means 'x
derives from y'. There is only one base class (A), and only one class
that may be marked final (C). This will often be the case.
> BTW, did you know you can extend a base class and simply make the
> extension final, and now all the methods on that derived class become
> non-virtual calls? Much easier to do than making the original base
> virtual (Note I haven't tested this to verify, but if not, it should be
> changed in the compiler).
This does however not help one iota when you have a reference to a base
class. This will also often be the case.
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list