Slow performance compared to C++, ideas?
Paulo Pinto
pjmlp at progtools.org
Tue Jun 4 00:57:02 PDT 2013
On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 at 07:39:19 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 at 07:12:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 6/3/2013 11:49 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>>> We can do it in a D specific way (using our own metadata and
>>> providing an
>>> optimization pas for LLVM) but most likely we won't even need
>>> to as the same
>>> feature is planned to be added to clang and we can most
>>> likely simply reuse
>>> clang's metadata.
>>
>> There is another way.
>>
>> D can be made aware that it is building an executable (after
>> all, that is why it invokes the linker). If you shove all the
>> source code into the compiler in one command, for an
>> executable, functions that are not overridden can be made
>> final.
>
> I think is interesting, because all open source software can be
> build from sources and can also be done on some commercial
> products in certain conditions. And compiling the world with D
> is realistic, due to small compilation time.
>
> I also don't understand why compilers don't generate executable
> directly and use a linker, as they already know the binary
> format and do optimization. I case of DMD which take all source
> file in a raw, I don't see any issues. Do DMD do best inlining
> optimizations than the linker when it get all sources as
> parameter?
Because C language tooling still persists around us.
In the Pascal family of languages, the linker is part of the
compiler, like in Turbo Pascal, Delphi, Oberon, ....
--
Paulo
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list