Slow performance compared to C++, ideas?
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Jun 7 00:42:57 PDT 2013
On 6/6/2013 10:14 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I don't buy all that "humans aren't rational" stuff.
I don't either, but I don't think that was my point.
My point is that a language where -O delivers the performance is preferable to a
language that you have to do careful annotations and run extra tools on to get it.
We discussed a while back an experimental Java compiler where annotations were
used to signify uniqueness, etc. The compiler was a technical success, but the
researcher was not very successful in getting users to use the annotations.
This is why I am pushing for D doing attribute inference as much as possible,
rather than expecting people to annotate carefully. I believe we are much more
likely to be successful with the former approach.
I'd very much prefer an auto-finalize mechanical solution.
BTW, dustmite and rdmd are great tools. I'm happy to have been proven wrong
about them.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list