reddit discussion on replacing Python in 0install

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Jun 15 10:04:24 PDT 2013


On 6/15/2013 3:24 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 June 2013 at 10:08:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 6/15/2013 3:04 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 15 June 2013 at 09:48:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2013 1:36 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>>>>> The solution that consist into flushing in main at the end of the program is
>>>>> problematic as well. At this point, from programmer perspective, the
>>>>> program ran
>>>>> fun and is terminated successfully. Still the whole stuff will explode
>>>>> under its
>>>>> feet, in the runtime. That isn't something we should promote.
>>>>
>>>> If the output failed to happen, how could the program have successfully
>>>> behaved as intended?
>>>
>>> From programmer's perspective.
>>
>> I'm sorry, that makes no sense to me.
>
> That is because you aren't reading what is written. See 2/
>
>> Defaulting to ignoring errors and blithely proceeding is not usually
>> considered a best practice.
>
> I have never written that. That explains 1/

I have no idea what you're talking about.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list