Migrating dmd to D?

Rob T alanb at ucora.com
Fri Mar 1 19:50:24 PST 2013


On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 03:16:59 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:01:20PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 3/1/2013 6:55 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> >On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 02:35:34 UTC, Walter Bright 
>> >wrote:
>> >>On 3/1/2013 7:43 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> >>>Wow. You make me feel really lucky that at my day job, I 
>> >>>once made
>> >>>a request to use a particular piece of open source 
>> >>>software, and
>> >>>the legal department actually replied with "the license is 
>> >>>MIT, it
>> >>>should be OK, approved."
>> >>
>> >>This is exactly why we are using a well-known license, 
>> >>rather than
>> >>rolling our own.
>> >
>> >
>> >Anyway the DDMD maintainer was asked about the license in 
>> >2010, he
>> >never picked one but it seemed like he was open to anything:
>> >http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=25763#25763
>> 
>> I'd recommend Boost or GPL. Anyhow, it's a pity to see his 
>> work go to
>> waste because of no license.
>
> I would personally go for GPL, but it does scare certain 
> companies off
> -- I've personally witnessed that.  Just FWIW.
>
>
> T

Yeah, GPL can have that effect.

One of the most friendly license I've seen is sqlite's
http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html

--rt


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list