Slower than Python
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Sun Mar 3 07:09:57 PST 2013
On 2013-03-02 17:48, John Colvin wrote:
> It does.
>
> Failing to beat mature, optimised C is not anything to be ashamed of,
> but being slower than python would be an abject failure of D as a
> compiled, systems programming language.
Then D needs to get faster, or we need to switch to C for some std lib
functions. In that case, as Walter said, we have failed.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list