The new std.process is ready for review

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 20:19:06 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad 
wrote:
> A special thanks to Vladimir P. for pointing out an egregious 
> flaw in the original design.

But wait, there's more!

(please don't hurt me)

1. Typo: "plattform"

2. Is there any meaning in the idea of consolidating 
spawnProcess/pipeProcess/execute and spawnShell/pipeShell/shell? 
How about that collectOutput idea?

3. Where are we with compatibility with the old module? One idea 
I haven't seen mentioned yet is: perhaps we could make the return 
value of "shell" have a deprecated "alias this" to the output 
string, so that it's implicitly convertible to a string to 
preserve compatibility.

4. Is there any way to deal with pipe clogging (pipe buffer 
getting exceeded when manually handling both input and output of 
a subprocess)? Can we query the number of bytes we can 
immediately read/write without blocking on a File?

5. How about that Environment.opIn_r?

Great work so far otherwise!