core.thread sleep(long period)
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Fri Mar 8 21:04:30 PST 2013
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 04:26:38 Damian wrote:
> Scheduled for depreciation December 2012? as this been overlooked
> or is it not depreciated anymore?
>
> core.thread
> static void sleep(long period);
Drat. I keep forgetting to look in druntime when moving stuff through the
deprecation process. _No_ functions in druntime or Phobos (aside from those
use to create durations) should be taking naked integral values. They should
be taking Duration.
If you ever see something in the docs which is scheduled for deprecation or
deprecated, and the date given with it has passed, it's been missed, not
purposefully left. If it had been purposefully left, any such notes would have
been removed, and it wouldn't be marked as deprecated.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list