About structs and performant handling
Namespace
rswhite4 at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 12 04:24:42 PDT 2013
On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 at 09:38:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 at 09:24:11 UTC, Namespace wrote:
>>> You never gave any rationale reason on that.
>>
>> Because I just like to have the control over what is passed by
>> ref and what by value.
>
> I'm sorry, but what you like is exactly the opposite of a
> rational example.
I'll always like to disabuse. So why do you think this is not a
rational example? And what would a rational example for you?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list