Why are opEquals/opCmp arguments not in or const for Objects?

[Stewart Gordon]

On 17/03/2013 23:19, Peter Williams wrote:
<snip>
> So my question is "Why are the arguments to opEquals and opCmp (for Objects) not declared
> in or const?".

Known bug.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1824

This was reported 5 years ago, and it's a serious issue, so I don't know why it's taking 
so long to get it sorted.

Stewart.

-- 
My email address is valid but not my primary mailbox and not checked regularly.  Please 
keep replies on the 'group where everybody may benefit.