The new std.process is ready for review

[1100110]

On 03/21/2013 11:35 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:08:00PM +0100, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 20 March 2013 at 22:46:58 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad
>> wrote:
>>> Sorry for the delay, but I've pushed a new version now.  There are
>>> still a few things I haven't done wrt. documentation* and
>>> unittests**, but the changes to the API and internals should be in
>>> place.
>>
>> Since (IIRC) all issues regarding incompatibility with std.process
>> have been resolved, how about renaming the module to std.process?
>> This way it'll also be easier to test backwards-compatibility in
>> existing programs.
>
> +1. I hate std.process2 with a passion. Let's keep it as std.process.
>
>
> T
>

++1

No more incrementing names!