The new std.process is ready for review

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 16:37:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:08:00PM +0100, Vladimir Panteleev 
> wrote:
>> 
>> Since (IIRC) all issues regarding incompatibility with 
>> std.process
>> have been resolved, how about renaming the module to 
>> std.process?
>> This way it'll also be easier to test backwards-compatibility 
>> in
>> existing programs.
>
> +1. I hate std.process2 with a passion. Let's keep it as 
> std.process.

The main reason I created a separate std.process2 was in fact not 
that I intended to keep it that way, but because I kept getting 
merge conflicts whenever I merged in Phobos master.

If you all don't mind, I'd like to keep it separate until we are 
satisfied that the API is stable.

Lars