bearophile can say "i told you so" (re uint->int implicit conv)

[bearophile]

Kagamin:

> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> because if it
>> doesn't, you're forced to cast all over the place
>
> There are so many implicit conversions between signed and 
> unsigned? Are they all ok?

I think Jonathan doesn't have enough proof that forbidding 
signed<->unsigned implicit casts in D is worse than the current 
situation that allows them.

Bye,
bearophile