Rvalue references - The resolution

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Saturday, May 04, 2013 20:12:24 Walter Bright wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by nop rvalue conversions, at least not by
> > name.
> 
> I meant exactly what you said: "and not know that it was effectively a
> no-op".

Oh, okay. LOL. I was thinking you meant something lower level like than that, 
and it didn't click. Yeah, distinguishing between functions that are meant to 
mutate their arguments and those that just want to pass them efficiently is the 
core issue with naked ref accepting rvalues, and we didn't come to an 
agreement on that.

- Jonathan M Davis