Rvalue references - The resolution
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat May 4 22:07:38 PDT 2013
On 5/4/2013 7:36 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> The trick is balancing it so that it's powerful enough and yet not too
> complicated to be useable by normal programmers. I think that we're okay, but
> I also think that we're pushing it as it is. Going with Bartosz proposal would
> almost certainly have been too much.
Consider also that the appeal of dynamic languages is people don't have to
annotate things with types.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list