The liabilities of binding rvalues to ref

[Walter Bright]

On 5/4/2013 10:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Just the factual events. We all said repeatedly in the beginning of the
> discussion that "we focus only on the safety aspect for now and then figure the
> rvalue references thing". I've heard you say it at least two times clear as day.
> We can't now construe a solution to the safety matter into a solution to binding
> rvalues to ref.

Yes, I should have entitled the thread that it was a solution to the safety 
issue. I agree that we deferred the 'nop' issue.