Migrating D front end to D - post Dconf

[Iain Buclaw]

On May 5, 2013 5:20 PM, "<luismarques at gmail.com>"@puremagic.com"
<"\"Luís".Marques"> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 5 May 2013 at 13:33:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> 1. Support extern(C++) classes so can have a split C++/D implementation
of eg: Expression and others.
>
>
> I don't know if this will be in the videos, so I'll ask here. I thought
extern(C++) only supported interfaces because everything else fell into the
"we'd need to pretty much include a C++ compiler into D to support that"
camp. Is that not quite true for classes? Did you find some compromise
between usefulness and complexity that wasn't obvious before, or did the D
compiler transition just motivate adding some additional complexity that
previously wasn't deemed acceptable?

It was mentioned, however I do believe there are a few more complicated
things than that.  Many would be in a position to educate you on that.

Regards
-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130505/95bb20de/attachment.html>