Rvalue references - The resolution

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 5 May 2013 at 23:45:21 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
> Just rethrowing an idea that was already thrown here: support 
> annotated lifetimes *in addition* to this runtime detection 
> system. Those who use manual memory management will need it to 
> make their code @safe. Those who stick to the GC won't have to. 
> Anyway, you don't have to implement both right away, it can 
> always be decided later.

Yes, that is also my point of view. We don't even need to support 
annotation now, simply ensure that we don't close the door to 
annotation.