Writing a unit test for a singleton implementation
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Thu May 16 10:33:04 PDT 2013
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 00:21:58 Idan Arye wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 21:52:40 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> > Sleep in concurrency code that aims to synchronize something is
> > always bad idea (=BUG).
>
> Don't say "always". Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
Of course, that in and of itself is an absolute... :)
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list