(X)HTML/XML in DDoc
Nick Sabalausky
SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com
Thu May 16 18:54:13 PDT 2013
On Fri, 17 May 2013 03:01:35 +0200
"Borden" <2013 at bordenrhodes.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 21:36:03 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
> > Can you provide a reference for the claim that the next
> > incarnation of TeX is going to be XML based? I did a quick
> > search and
> > couldn't turn up anything. Perhaps it was some sort of April
> > fool's joke
> > :o)
>
> You're right. I fell for it. I think I was referring to his
> announcement of iTeX, which any idiot should have noticed was a
> joke. I'm no idiot, I'm apparently far more gullible :-P
I think it's quite easy to believe joke claims of adopting XML,
considering how much XML already gets used where it doesn't belong.
This one's my favorite (a joke, obviously):
http://www.charlespetzold.com/etc/CSAML.html
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list