Investigation: downsides of being generic and correct
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Fri May 17 04:26:22 PDT 2013
On Friday, 17 May 2013 at 10:09:11 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> If naive D code has to be significantly faster than optimised C
> for people to not go "D sucks, it's only as fast as python"
> then we're pretty much doomed by peoples stupidity.
No. The whole benefit of D is lost if you have to tweak
everything in complex way to get it run fast.
It means we failed at designing nice API.
Dev don't have years to sped on every existing language to know
if it is good or not and figure out all the subtelties.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list