Request d.vim testing
Jesse Phillips
Jessekphillips+D at gmail.com
Mon May 20 16:20:07 PDT 2013
On Monday, 20 May 2013 at 23:08:26 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> I've fixed cgdb syntax highlighting for various literals here.
>
> https://github.com/cgdb/cgdb/pull/22
>
> Wonder if anyone has any ideas for q"( strings )"
>
> Regards
In case you don't know (guessing you might not based on the
comment):
q{ Token string here }
q"( custom wysiwyg string delimiter )"
The first should probably highlight as normal code (Vim is doing
that). The second is a normal string.
The token string is interesting since it can be used to house
non-D language making D not necessarily the proper highlighting
scheme.... hmm I wonder if I could make vim.d identify the
language (probably needs specific indicator though).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list