External lib unittests: they're killin me!

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 10:06:46 -0700
Timothee Cour <thelastmammoth at gmail.com> wrote:

> it's only module level granularity.
> 
> I agree that a library solution is the way to go, however there needs
> to be a way to have finer granularity, ie being able to call
> individual unittests. I gave the reasons in the 2nd post in this
> thread. Syntax would be: unittest(test_fun){...}
> having a short syntax such as this will make people use it.
> 
> digressing, I wish there would be a simple non-anonymous way to vote
> for such features, to see whether most people agree/disagree. It's
> easier than voting by email, which invariably gets lost in
> digressions (as I'm doing here).
> 

Bugzilla has a voting system <http://d.puremagic.com/issues/>. Every
user has up to 10 votes to place on whatever tickets they want.