std.uni vs std.unicode and beyond?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 23:25:47 deadalnix wrote:
> It isn't really a rename as a new module is being integrated. We
> can keep what we have under std.uni for a while. If you want the
> new hotness, go for std.unicode .

Except that std.uni already exists. It's just that we're adding a bunch more 
to it and improving the implementation of what's already there. Changing the 
name _will_break code, and as the benefits of renaming it are purely aesthetic, 
I don't think that it's worth it.

- Jonathan M Davis