[article] Language Design Deal Breakers

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Sun, 26 May 2013 13:27:55 +1000
Peter Williams <pwil3058 at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> 
> I should mention that this was back in the mid
> 90s and C++ may have improved since then :-).
> 

I dunno. The more I learned about C++'s more advances features the more
disillusioned I became with it. I was always happiest (or at least,
least unhappy) with the "C with classes" form of C++.

But then again, maybe that has nothing to do with "older C++ vs newer
C++"?