[article] Language Design Deal Breakers

[Walter Bright]

On 5/27/2013 2:05 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 08:06:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> That is not enough. NotNull must be initialized, so the compiler
>>> have to track initialization in way it don't do today. This is
>>> the exact same processing required to ensure non null references.
>>
>> @disable this(); would solve that.
>>
>
> That is the point, the logic required to support @disable this is the exact same
> that the one required to support non null. That is the freaking same thing :
> track initialization and yell at the programmer when you can't find it.

Are you arguing that notnull should be a core language feature instead of a 
library one?