Long symbol names (Was: demangle doesn't work with...)

[Peter Alexander]

On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 16:18:34 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 15:22:21 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
>> Am I the only person that worries greatly about the length of 
>> symbols in D?
> ———
> <snip>
> ———
>
> That's 13 kilobytes of data for a single symbol name!

The symbols typically contain a lot of repeated sub strings. 
Perhaps there is a better mangling scheme that encodes it with 
some kind of prefix tree?