More on "Component Programming"

[bearophile]

Andrei Alexandrescu:

> I'm disappointed cartesianProduct works that way; I should have 
> caught that during the code review. A better iteration order 
> would have spanned the lower position in both ranges first, 
> i.e. create squares of increasing side in the 2D space.

I opened this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9878

Bye,
bearophile