A different tuple syntax

[watcher]

On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 14:06:15 UTC, Diggory wrote:
> Could also do something in the style of token strings, ie.
>
> t{ ... }
>
> It's lighter than "tup" and there's a precedent for it already 
> in the language with q{ ... } which also means there should be 
> no issues parsing it.

These are the hacks that bring languages into a kind of brainfuck 
syntax. Why not keep a language easy readable and understandable. 
A precedence does not imply that it is a desirable thing to have.