Inability to dup/~ for const arrays of class objects

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Thu, 30 May 2013 12:08:45 -0400, Maxim Fomin <maxim at maxim-fomin.ru>  
wrote:

> No, sorry this cannot be accepted. Formal definitions can be changed due  
> to private POV and as far as spec exists, it is higher priority on any  
> private POV, especially when it is problematic.

If we don't use the same terms to mean the same things, then there is no  
point in discussing.

The spec's definition is somewhat wrong, and needs to be clarified.  This  
is an important thing when people coming from other languages are trying  
to anchor what they know to what D provides, we need to use correct  
terminology.

Once that is fixed (and you can come to grips with the change), we can  
discuss.

-Steve