core.memory GC interface / specification
safety0ff
safety0ff.dev at gmail.com
Tue Nov 5 10:43:17 PST 2013
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 17:15:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Most of these are sound like either implementation or
> documentation bugs. Please file them in bugzilla
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/.
For interior pointer issues:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11393
For non-GC pointer issue:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11446
> Generally we can't force implementations to provide checks that
> are possibly expensive to implement. So it might be more
> appropriate to disallow using non-GC pointer with the GC, but
> this needs some more thought.
Any preliminary thoughts on which approach should be taken for
interior pointers with regards to these two functions?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list