Review of std.signal
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Thu Nov 7 12:48:57 PST 2013
On 2013-11-07 14:45, Dicebot wrote:
> Time to move forward with some more reviews :)
>
> Our current victim is std.signal by Robert Klotzner which is supposed to
> deprecate and supersede existing (and broken) std.signals
* If a template mixin, which uses the string mixin, is provided the
syntax will look a bit nicer
* Isn't it better to use an enum for the protection attributes?
* Would it make sense to allow "export" as a protection attribute as well?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list