Why the @ in @safe? & UDAs

[Kapps]

On Sunday, 10 November 2013 at 20:12:39 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Code relying on stringof, eg. stringof returning '@safe' in 
> types instead of 'safe' would be quite hard to handle as well, 
> but it should still be possible to handle the relevant subset 
> of cases.

I think it was somewhat decided that .stringof can't be relied 
upon anyways, when it changed and broke a bit of existing code 
previously.