DIP 50 - AST macros

[Dicebot]

> Think about the desired feature mentioned earlier in this 
> thread of being able to insert a "return;" statement, causing 
> what looks like a function call to return from the caller.
>
> That's a major step increase in obfuscation, not just a detail.

You do realize that, as per more strict proposal, it won't change 
a _single_ thing about semantics of actual D function but allows 
to generate another one with semantics defined by macro?

It has _zero_ added ofbuscation over existing template + traits 
combo. You have not shown a single example which proves otherwise 
and keep resorting to personal experience argument instead of 
doing actual comparison. You have full right to do so but it does 
not sound like a decision made on behalf of careful reasoning.