@property (again)

[eles]

On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 14:19:22 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 13:04:21 UTC, John Colvin 
> wrote:
>> 3) properties decay to normal functions when they have their 
>> address taken
>>
> Is there some reason why we _need_ to be able to take the 
> address of properties?  I've yet to see a good argument in 
> favour of it, and I've seen several against.  I think that 
> whole idea is a misfeature that won't be missed.
>
> -Wyatt

++1++

it only brings trouble, as well as this discussion about decaying.