Review of std.signal

[robert]

>
> Thanks!
>
> Looks there are no real objections against the proposal but I 
> am rather concerned about general lack of activity during 
> review. As a compromise, what about putting it in "candidate" 
> category 
> (http://code.dlang.org/?sort=updated&category=library.std_aspirant) 
> and making 1-2 month pause before proceeding to actual voting? 
> That will also fix minor issue of me being a bit busy and not 
> paying proper attention :)

Well it was already on the registry for a few months, I don't 
really see what another two months would gain. Considering the 
current state of std.signals and how nothing has happened to it 
in years, it does not seem that there is a huge amount of people 
interested in signals for D, I also don't see this to change 
within the next two months.

I personally would like to continue going on to voting and get it 
over with, so I can clear this item from my todo list ;-)

That being said, I of course understand if you are busy right 
now, a problem well known, so in the end it is your call. Thanks 
again for doing this in the first place!

Best regards,

Robert