std.complex
Shammah Chancellor
anonymous at coward.com
Fri Nov 22 20:37:19 PST 2013
//Hijack
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/cppcomplex.html
> • Consider the formula (1 - infinity*i) * i which should produce
> (infinity + i). However, if instead the second factor is (0 + i) rather
> than just i, the result is (infinity + NaN*i), a spurious NaN was
> generated.
> • A distinct imaginary type preserves the sign of 0, necessary for
> calculations involving branch cuts.
Is this stuff no longer an issue?
-Shammah
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list