D vs Go in real life

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 11/28/13 8:07 AM, Bienlein wrote:
> On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 14:43:11 UTC, Chris wrote:
>
>> Go is web-oriented, so it seems, and I'm sure it will be marketed as
>> the "one size fits all" solution for web development, multi-core and
>> whatnot. But D goes deeper. D raises fundamental questions about how a
>> good program should look like, what is good / practicable. I know that
>> this approach doesn't sell, but it's the best I've ever come across. D
>> makes you think and re-assess your own code time and again.
>
> I basically I agree with this. But lately, I was asking myself, though,
> whether me classifying Go as simplistic was wrong. I programmed the
> canonical Scala trait sample in Go. In that sample from the Scala book
> there is a trait Rectangular with a upperLeft and bottomRight point.
> Some class Rectangle extends trait Rectangular. I could get the same
> accomplished using delegation in Go. The solution in Go is much much
> simpler and from what I can tell the power is the same. So this made me
> think.

Interesting. Could you please create a paste with the two code samples?

Thanks,

Andrei