Too focused on C++ programmers?

[bearophile]

qznc:

> How can type safety be "better"? Type safety is binary. A type 
> cannot be 50% safe.

You can have many different levels of type safety :-) While the D 
type system gives only a binary answer regarding the correctness 
of the types of a program, there are many different ways to write 
your D code, with various amounts of static typing.

Bye,
bearophile