std.complex

[Iain Buclaw]

On 27 November 2013 22:29, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
<joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 26/11/13 17:28, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>> On 11/26/13 3:22 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>>>
>>> So, as other people have suggested, really the only thing we can
>>> reasonably do is to define a separate Imaginary type
>>
>>
>> I agree. Let's move forward with this.
>
>
> I've started work, code is here:
> https://github.com/WebDrake/phobos/tree/imaginary
>
> Feedback, forks/pull requests, etc. welcome.

That repo doesn't seem to exist (must by my imagination).