If you had money to place for a bounty, what would you choose?
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.ca
Fri Nov 29 11:48:20 PST 2013
On 2013-11-29 15:10:27 +0000, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> said:
> On 2013-11-29 15:08, Manu wrote:
>
>> I've been very excited about this for a long time... why is it sitting
>> in limbo?
>
> I don't know. It seems Walter don't want us to be worse than
> Objective-C, meaning he want ARC. But as far as I understand it, we
> couldn't come to an agreement on how to implement ARC. But to be able
> to be compatible with ARC in Objective-C we would need to follow that
> very
Actually, if you want ARC to be compatible with Objective-C, someone
familiar with Objective-C memory management has to design and implement
the thing. Anything designed to work for Objective-C can easily be
retrofitted to work with other D types, but the reverse is not true. So
I'd tend to say it'd be better to implement ARC as part of the
D/Objective-C project first, otherwise you're trying to solve too many
problems at the same time and it becomes a mess.
--
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.ca
http://michelf.ca
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list