If you had money to place for a bounty, what would you choose?

[Nick]

On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 15:23:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 11/29/13 5:43 AM, Manu wrote:
>> * ARC
>> * rvalue -> ref
>> * virtual-by-default
>> * GC improvements
>> * AA fixes
>
> These are good themes but a conversation with one of the 
> bountysource founders revealed to me that smaller, precise 
> tasks for moderate amounts tend to do better than large 
> projects that are only partially specified, even for large 
> amounts.
>
> We should break each of these down into bite-sized bugzilla 
> issues.
>
>
> Andrei

A bite-sized GC-related improvement is the @nogc attribute I've 
been craving for for quite some time. See: 
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219

If I had money, I'd be putting it on this for sure. For system 
and game programmers it's a godsend, and it will put some C++ 
fanatics at ease with D's GC. With this feature I can protect the 
critical sections of my code with a firm guarantee that I won't 
see any unexpected activity from the GC.