std.d.lexer : voting thread

[Dicebot]

On Sunday, 6 October 2013 at 09:37:18 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> Maybe we should wait at least 1-2 weeks from last review before 
> start a new voting? Maybe we should announce upcoming voting 
> for one week prior to start a new voting thread? I belive that 
> it pays additional attention to the new module and helps avoid 
> situations like this.

There were more than 1 week of time between last comment in 
review thread and start of voting. If you needed more time for 
review, you should have mentioned it. In current situation I 
simply have waited until Brian makes post-review changes he 
personally wanted and moved forward as it was pretty clear no 
further input is incoming.

Any formal review may potentially result in short voting after if 
no critical issues are found so I don't think it makes sense in 
making any additional announcements. There are no special points 
of attention - if review was declared and you want to make some 
input, it should be done right there.

Of course, review process is as much community-defined as 
anything else here. You can always define an alternative one and 
propose it for discussion. Right now though I am sticking to one 
mentioned in wiki + some of personal common sense for undefined 
parts (because I am lazy :)).

Also you can lend a helping hand and manage next review on your 
own in a way you find reasonable :P