etc vs. package mangers

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 10/6/13 10:10 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 6 October 2013 at 17:08:25 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> isn't this really what has just been discussed under the proposed name
>> of stdx?
>>
>> ... and if so, why isn't it being used?
>
> This is exactly why I'm not too thrilled to make another attempt at
> establishing something like that. ;)

We could improve things on our end by featuring etc documentation more 
prominently etc. I don't think there's a need to reboot things with 
stdx. Just improve etc.

Andrei