Official stdx

[eles]

On Friday, 4 October 2013 at 10:02:21 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> I propose that the current review process be redirected to a 
> new target package in the phobos repo, stdx, which would then 
> have a separate review process for inclusion in std.

not good. stdx is the same trap as javax: throw-away that never 
gets thown away and sticks around until forever.

better is to include it in std with a big pragma that warns at 
compilation time about its instability (a kind of staging... 
stage)

warnings about interface/behavior changes should be issued with 
every new release of the module *in code* (and in doc, of course)

old interfaces could be or could not be not kept with 
deperecation pragmas

in the medium/long term, pragmas will get removed progressively