Official stdx

[eles]

On Monday, 7 October 2013 at 15:36:23 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Friday, 4 October 2013 at 10:49:58 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> Then call it `experimental` instead of stdx. That's obvious 
> (stdx sound like an extension of std library). I wonder if 
> someone would complain that experimental module broke.

if nobody complains, then experimental would be useless: code 
could go directly into std.