Official stdx

[Dicebot]

On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 06:23:41 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Monday, 7 October 2013 at 08:20:20 UTC, eles wrote:
>> not good. stdx is the same trap as javax: throw-away that 
>> never gets thown away and sticks around until forever.
>
> That's just a matter of enforcing the policy. The only problem 
> I see is that stdx can be good enough to be an excuse for not 
> having the feature in phobos.

That is exactly why it is not suitable for D. Enforcing policies 
is not something we are good at ;) Generally if something is not 
going to work in an anarchic mode with some tooling automation 
support, it is not going to work at all ;)