dub: should we make it the de jure package manager for D?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-10-08 12:55, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

> Any chance that Dub packages could be called something else instead,
> such as "bundles", throughout the documentation, wiki, etc.? The point
> here would be to limit cognitive confusion/overlap with D language
> packages. It's just a minor cleanup I know, and of subjective value, but
> still I think it would be nicer...

What if it always said "dub package"? There's always the chance of 
confusion. On Mac OS X a "bundle" is a special folder containing an 
executable or dynamic library plus its resources.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg