The "no gc" crowd

[Walter Bright]

On 10/9/2013 1:59 AM, JR wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 02:22:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> * Get Robert Schadek's precise GC in. Walter and I have become 101% convinced
>> a precise GC is the one way to go about GC.
>
> An orthogonal question, but is Lucarella's CDGC (still) being ported? There's
> nothing mutually exclusive between a precise and a concurrent gc, no?

I thought that got stuck on the problem that the linux system libraries had some 
sort of threading problem with them.