draft proposal for ref counting in D

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Wed Oct 9 19:32:46 PDT 2013


On 6/30/2013 7:47 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
 > Le 30-juin-2013 à 22:26, Walter Bright  a écrit :
 >
 >> This is actually a problem right now with the GC, as destructors may be run 
in another thread than they belong in. The situation you describe is not worse 
or better than that, it's the same thing. The solution is to run the destructors 
in the same thread the objects belong in.
 > Indeed. Maybe that could work. How ironic that we can't implement RC 
efficiently because of the GC.
 >
 > That said, it strongly favors having a base RC object implementation in 
druntime, where it can be kept in sync with the GC.
 >

The GC doesn't need to know about it.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list